I'm so fucking sick of these slutty costumes marketed at females for Halloween! Why do guys get to wear the awesome, funny, clever costumes while women are only encouraged to dress slutty? Blah.
and yeah, I agree with philgross. Bitch looks happier than the boy.
Witchgirl: Robocop? Is this your joystick or are you happy to see me? Robocop: Don't compute. Head going to explode. I touch your ass, just in case, Witchgirl. Shedevil: Do you like my boobs? Do you like my boobs? Do you like my boobs?
Party City sent me a catalog. One costume set was "cowboys & native americans". Go back 5 pages and you see an "Indian"(not the Hindu type) solo costume. Great proofreading.
I'm not exactly sure why this one is on PSD. Clearly, it is a disaster. But, most Halloween items are throw away commodities.. as cheap as the packages that hold them. Frankly, I'd be more surprised to find any Halloween packages that had used exceptional Photoshop skills. Every Halloween package I've ever picked up was at least some form of a PSD. You could probably fill the PSD pages with nearly every Halloween costume package, let alone the skull candles and fake spider's webs.
commorancy: If it had just been packaging for cheap stuff shipped in containers last June from Guangzhou-which about 99% of the costumes are--you would be right.
But this is the front page for what tries to be a big time web marketplace so the standards should be a bit higher.
No no no, you're getting it all wrong. This is clearly no PsD but a scene of a slightly adulterated version of "Hansel and Gretel".
See? Hansel has been caged up by the evil witch (middle) who is visiting him daily to check if he's fat enough to be getting slaughtered. Alas, Hansel doesn't have a twig to present her instead of a bony finger - but he does have a too-small Robocop suit! So, he's dressing up and presents the witch the boniest part he has to offer, which are his private parts. As the witch grabs it, his blood starts to boil, but since the helmet of his costume is much too tight, the blood cannot rush downwards, so his head starts swelling (left). This also explains his less than delighted facial expression. Oh, and the person on the right is Gretel who is a in a diabolic mood, since she's about to push the evil pedowitch into the oven.
Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist-- sexy Halloween costumes are tiresome, but you're confusing cause and effect. Don't hate the poor costume manufacturers, instead hate your fellow women-- for whom Halloween's not about scary, but a license to be slutty.
Unfortunately, 99% of the costume marketing materials for Halloween are from China. That means that the person putting together this ad basically had limited and cheesy material from which to choose. I'm sure they could have devised something new and more sophisticated. Instead, it appears they chose to pull from existing packages, which is easier and faster.
The reality is, even this ad itself is still considered a short term throw-away and it was certainly treated that way. Respectable site or not, Halloween has become a cheesy and fast marketing event (i.e., do it easy, do it awful, get it over with fast and move on to the next cheesy holiday marketing campaign).
Obviously the artist has some kind of issue with long and rigid object. The little girl have the broom stick missing and the devilish woman is missing the trident
Domitype noted that they've changed the image already (http://images.buycostumes.com/mgen/merchandiser/newsletter/images/home_10_12_2009.jpg), but it was clearly done by someone who wants to eliminate the boy. Why else would anyone dress a kid in solid black from head to toe, including covering his face and hands in black, and then send him out trick-or-treating where he'll likely have to cross streets at night? And what's the girl in the middle supposed to be? A St. Patrick's Day dominatrix?
No, but the new image is a continued nightmare. The "child" wearing the black all-in-on-with-total-coverage still has massive head and his left side seems to abruptly end - possibly where it enters a parallel universe through a rift in the space time whatevers.
Why do they do this to themselves? There's nothing wrong with a kid having a normal sized head and a set of left ribs, is there? Jeez...
@thebeermaster: "Your spam is %&9!\*$ annoying!!1!11!!eleven" eleven?! Just threw up laughing...
I am both saddened and disappointed that you would refer to a young girl as a "bitch." It's not edgy or clever -- it's inappropriate and offensive.
Young girls have enough obstacles to overcome while growing up without being verbally denigrated and demeaned. How about you chose your words more carefully?
Everybody else:
Attributing sexual behavior to the children in this picture strikes me as highly inappropriate. I realize the picture is weird, but some of these comments really go too far.
This picture is innocent enough, but the sexualization of children in pictures on the web is a serious problem -- it's called child pornography, and it's a federal crime. The sexual exploitation of children puts real children at risk, and it's no laughing matter, especially if you know a child who has fallen victim to sexual exploitation and abuse.
I'm sorry to spoil your fun, but I care about the welfare of children, and I think these comments have gone too far.
61 comments:
what is that she is holding?
I think it's supposed to be her broom. But it looks more like something that would be attached to the giant headed boy beside her...
lawlzomg!!!
wv: egans --- more like egad!!!
my girlfriend did that
"Mom, the helmet is too big!"
"Don't worry, you'll grow into it."
She looks a lot happier about it than he does...
I'm so fucking sick of these slutty costumes marketed at females for Halloween! Why do guys get to wear the awesome, funny, clever costumes while women are only encouraged to dress slutty? Blah.
and yeah, I agree with philgross. Bitch looks happier than the boy.
Be careful where you put your hands. More careful where you put other people hands.
Oh dear, that is just so wrong. Can someone hand the witch a real broomstick to complete the look of her costume?
It also looks like the woman is grabbing the little girl's butt.
Yes he's not very happy looking. Would you be if someone mistook you for toothpaste that needed to be squeezed back into the tube?
Witchgirl: Robocop? Is this your joystick or are you happy to see me?
Robocop: Don't compute. Head going to explode. I touch your ass, just in case, Witchgirl.
Shedevil: Do you like my boobs? Do you like my boobs? Do you like my boobs?
And so on.
Porn by PSD. Everyday there is a new genre.
Bill In Asheville said...
what is that she is holding?
The boy's joystick.
And the slutty devil girl has lost her right arm. Probably something to with double-crossing Beelzebub.
He's not grumpy... that's just his "O" face....
And I mean what's the slutty gal to do with them kids?
She must have passed on some tricks and treats... :P
Hysterical !!! I can see so many things wrong with this photo.
They revised their front page already!
http://images.buycostumes.com/mgen/merchandiser/newsletter/images/home_10_12_2009.jpg
she's holding a br..WHAAAAAT?
kid's head is the helmet...and..
the lady is a child..inside she's just a child
It looks like a Rifftrax cover art.
Party City sent me a catalog. One costume set was "cowboys & native americans". Go back 5 pages and you see an "Indian"(not the Hindu type) solo costume. Great proofreading.
To domitype: they may have changed the image but obviously not the message.
It still looks like the girl in the middle is grabbing for the guy's metaphor.
Robo-paedo sex whoring; yay!
I'm not exactly sure why this one is on PSD. Clearly, it is a disaster. But, most Halloween items are throw away commodities.. as cheap as the packages that hold them. Frankly, I'd be more surprised to find any Halloween packages that had used exceptional Photoshop skills. Every Halloween package I've ever picked up was at least some form of a PSD. You could probably fill the PSD pages with nearly every Halloween costume package, let alone the skull candles and fake spider's webs.
totalwatsansrilanka...
take you elephants and shove them up your ars*...
Your spam is %&9!\*$ annoying!!1!11!!eleven
commorancy: If it had just been packaging for cheap stuff shipped in containers last June from Guangzhou-which about 99% of the costumes are--you would be right.
But this is the front page for what tries to be a big time web marketplace so the standards should be a bit higher.
No no no, you're getting it all wrong. This is clearly no PsD but a scene of a slightly adulterated version of "Hansel and Gretel".
See? Hansel has been caged up by the evil witch (middle) who is visiting him daily to check if he's fat enough to be getting slaughtered. Alas, Hansel doesn't have a twig to present her instead of a bony finger - but he does have a too-small Robocop suit! So, he's dressing up and presents the witch the boniest part he has to offer, which are his private parts. As the witch grabs it, his blood starts to boil, but since the helmet of his costume is much too tight, the blood cannot rush downwards, so his head starts swelling (left). This also explains his less than delighted facial expression.
Oh, and the person on the right is Gretel who is a in a diabolic mood, since she's about to push the evil pedowitch into the oven.
It all makes sense.
Rule 34 people, rule 34.
Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist-- sexy Halloween costumes are tiresome, but you're confusing cause and effect. Don't hate the poor costume manufacturers, instead hate your fellow women-- for whom Halloween's not about scary, but a license to be slutty.
What is that on the far right, The Hooker from Hades?
ok a full grown slut (right) grabbing a 12 yo girls butt. and the 12 yo is spanking robo boys monkey, while he fondles her butt too.
No wonder his head is swelling up inside that helmet!
wv; psises (no comment)
Lisa; we should hate women who dress provocatively? Maybe we should just stone them to death for having the cheek to wear what they like.
Not surprising that their tagline is "Get it when YOU want it!"
For a second there, I thought the disaster was the woman's bizarrely bent hand. Only after I read the caption did I realize the girl was a whore.
....How very... good for marketing to a teenage audience "too old" for Halloween... that image is... :P
Is that a Fun-Size Snickers in your pants or are you just happy to see me?
what is that? haha
Live Soccer Feed
ewaffle,
Unfortunately, 99% of the costume marketing materials for Halloween are from China. That means that the person putting together this ad basically had limited and cheesy material from which to choose. I'm sure they could have devised something new and more sophisticated. Instead, it appears they chose to pull from existing packages, which is easier and faster.
The reality is, even this ad itself is still considered a short term throw-away and it was certainly treated that way. Respectable site or not, Halloween has become a cheesy and fast marketing event (i.e., do it easy, do it awful, get it over with fast and move on to the next cheesy holiday marketing campaign).
Obviously the artist has some kind of issue with long and rigid object. The little girl have the broom stick missing and the devilish woman is missing the trident
Domitype noted that they've changed the image already (http://images.buycostumes.com/mgen/merchandiser/newsletter/images/home_10_12_2009.jpg), but it was clearly done by someone who wants to eliminate the boy. Why else would anyone dress a kid in solid black from head to toe, including covering his face and hands in black, and then send him out trick-or-treating where he'll likely have to cross streets at night? And what's the girl in the middle supposed to be? A St. Patrick's Day dominatrix?
IMHO the sequel is even better...
http://images.buycostumes.com/mgen/merchandiser/newsletter/images/home_10_12_2009.jpg
wv: valforr = value for raping (the kid with the helmet)
Satan is having a bad influence on that girl it would appear.
Kid Gi-Joe is not upset. Look at the kung fu grip he's getting. He is just trying to keep a straight face for the camera.
And the images has been fixed again so she's no longer stroking the lance.
No, but the new image is a continued nightmare. The "child" wearing the black all-in-on-with-total-coverage still has massive head and his left side seems to abruptly end - possibly where it enters a parallel universe through a rift in the space time whatevers.
Why do they do this to themselves? There's nothing wrong with a kid having a normal sized head and a set of left ribs, is there? Jeez...
@thebeermaster:
"Your spam is %&9!\*$ annoying!!1!11!!eleven"
eleven?! Just threw up laughing...
I went to see the new front page, and did some digging on the previous front page before the actual one:
Oct 12 -> Here
"Can you sort out my helmet please young lady... no, not that one..."
@bckspc
I like the other one better :)
1. Huge hed pastede on yay!
2. Broom handle positioned like p33n0r.
Oy!
i think robocop and shedevil are holding hands behind hand-job-witch's back. it's a halloween/porn soap opera.
Wow, some disasters are disastier than others, but this is the first one I laughed out loud at.
I think it's supposed to be her broom
Hi All
I invite you to visit my blog
http://strange-triangle.blogspot.com
http://m-m-f-y-w.blogspot.com
http://natshehy-barca.blogspot.com
http://m-m-w-a.blogspot.com/
I confess, I was looking at the 'mom' for too long and then I saw...!!!
Please check out my fab blogs...oh, stuff it.
You know, if Ralph Lauren had started making Halloween costumes they could have fitted five models into the ad instead of just three.
Burlesk Grotesk-- No, stoning them seems overkill-- hate's sufficient.
I was just pointing out that slutty Halloween costumes aren't something that are inflicted upon women, but rather the strong preference of women.
The guy on the left obviously, looks a LOT like my husband!! WTF
The boy looks like terminator^)
Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist:
I am both saddened and disappointed that you would refer to a young girl as a "bitch." It's not edgy or clever -- it's inappropriate and offensive.
Young girls have enough obstacles to overcome while growing up without being verbally denigrated and demeaned. How about you chose your words more carefully?
Everybody else:
Attributing sexual behavior to the children in this picture strikes me as highly inappropriate. I realize the picture is weird, but some of these comments really go too far.
This picture is innocent enough, but the sexualization of children in pictures on the web is a serious problem -- it's called child pornography, and it's a federal crime. The sexual exploitation of children puts real children at risk, and it's no laughing matter, especially if you know a child who has fallen victim to sexual exploitation and abuse.
I'm sorry to spoil your fun, but I care about the welfare of children, and I think these comments have gone too far.
Thank you for listening to my concerns.
wow those kids are going to grow up to be 8 feet tall... but the handjob is really much more distracting.
and look at the impressive implants on mom!! "wowee we're gonna get a LOTTA candy this year!"
Post a Comment