Yeah... she is clearly leaning forward, hiding her legs behind the door, and can't the guy just happen to be in a public restroom... sometimes these don't make much sense....
It's still a crap concept (and she still has no legs) but the bathroom in question is in a scene where the three children trash a public bathroom, yes...
OK, I've GOT to know why there are so many missing legs and limbs out there in the world's advertising.
What do people do, say, "these legs are distracting" and intentionally delete them to simplify the layout? (this seems possible in some of the complex layouts where a number of people are standing around, some behind others)
Or maybe the legs look awkward and they plan to replace them and forget? I mean really, how do you misplace legs??? This takes considerably more intentional effort to do the inexplicable than botching a zit-airbrushing or something.
Granted, this one may not be a PSD if it's too old, but clearly a number of missing-limb PSDs have been featured.
Nooo, she's not leaning forward with her legs behind the door. For one, she's not leaning forward.
For two, I went "Michael Keaton? Really?" and searched for more images from the movie. I found that same image quite a few times--in most of them, the door isn't there (and neither are the legs).
"Mr. Mom" was just 3 years before Beetlejuice and 6 years before Batman. Huh. Amazing what makeup can do, I guess.
omg... htere are so many wrong things with this one: the mom's legs, the children's arms, the weird acomodation of the things in the mirros... and of course, the public bathroom setting... just to name a few
35 comments:
This should be called a paste-up disaster.
Clearly she keeps her legs in the suitcase, for maximum portability.
lol!!! i loved this movie as a kid!
was michael keaton's head always that small?
This poster circa 1983 predates Photoshop 1.0 by about 7 years
Am I the only one who is extremely amused by the "start from the bottom up" thing? Yes? Okay. :)
Yeah... she is clearly leaning forward, hiding her legs behind the door, and can't the guy just happen to be in a public restroom... sometimes these don't make much sense....
she has alien hands!
I think Mrs Mom is a minotaur and so you can't see her four legs because her torso sticks out the front.
Obviously!
@Guilherme: Michael Jackson can do that.
Agree. This is an Art Department (or "Photo Shop", if you will) disaster.
Noting wrong with the mirror this time
Question is: what is the baby shooting out of his ass? :)
so we're counting things that happened before photoshop now. awesome
It's still a crap concept (and she still has no legs) but the bathroom in question is in a scene where the three children trash a public bathroom, yes...
Shockingly, yes. They're in a public restroom in that scene (his former office, IIRC). I'm ashamed I know that.
She's been pasted in... well before the advent of Photoshop.
OK, I've GOT to know why there are so many missing legs and limbs out there in the world's advertising.
What do people do, say, "these legs are distracting" and intentionally delete them to simplify the layout? (this seems possible in some of the complex layouts where a number of people are standing around, some behind others)
Or maybe the legs look awkward and they plan to replace them and forget? I mean really, how do you misplace legs??? This takes considerably more intentional effort to do the inexplicable than botching a zit-airbrushing or something.
Granted, this one may not be a PSD if it's too old, but clearly a number of missing-limb PSDs have been featured.
Does anyone have any idea???
Maybe Teri Garr is actually a large snake?
Nooo, she's not leaning forward with her legs behind the door. For one, she's not leaning forward.
For two, I went "Michael Keaton? Really?" and searched for more images from the movie. I found that same image quite a few times--in most of them, the door isn't there (and neither are the legs).
"Mr. Mom" was just 3 years before Beetlejuice and 6 years before Batman. Huh. Amazing what makeup can do, I guess.
Eduard wrote: "Noting wrong with the mirror this time"
If the mirror and the wash basins are supposed to be fixed to the wall then how can the toilet paper be looped over the top of the mirror?
AD: OK for this we want to show the dad trying to cope amongst chaos and a working mom.
PS schlub: OK, i got this photo of the dad in the bathroom, that one is good. and I can throw in the kids and some TP.
AD: great, and use the one of the mom with the briefcase going to work.
PSS: but her legs are hidden behind a car in that shot.
AD: ah just cut it out, no one will ever notice...
LOL I found a new one too.
omg... htere are so many wrong things with this one: the mom's legs, the children's arms, the weird acomodation of the things in the mirros... and of course, the public bathroom setting... just to name a few
was there a photoshop when this movie came out in the early eighties?
Ahh, the radiant Teri Garr.
My first awkward fantasy.
No PSD at all!
I can clearly see her legs behind her pinky!
Unsubswhatever!
She's obviously transfixed by the patterns her fingers make against the fluorescent lighting.
nice pic and little bit funny and beautiful mom too...:)
chad.schofield said...
" LOL I found a new one too."
You try sewing fast enough to capture an action shot.
Think Jack might want to consider starting from the bottom down
Caroline is a rising executive who just lost her bottom.
Perhaps you should create a new category, something along the lines "Pre-photoshop disasters".
And why is no one concerned that Michael Keaton seems to be using that kid as a chair?
This picture is a disaster, but why post a 27-year old disaster? That seems like dredging.
while they're at it, they should photoshop the baby's butt off the mirror
Post a Comment