AGE ISSUE: WHERE EXACTLY IS YOUR BUTT?
Thanks to everyone who sent this in. Bigger version here, courtesy of Go Fug Yourself!
Vogue: And Don't Get Me Started On The Airbrushing
AGE ISSUE: WHERE EXACTLY IS YOUR BUTT?
Thanks to everyone who sent this in. Bigger version here, courtesy of Go Fug Yourself!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
29 comments:
Is that a Plutonium fiber dress?
So what exactly happened here?
Was she naked so they had to photoshop a dress on her?
Does anybody have any extra limbs we can add to this picture? Make sure they have spots! We can't have anybody looking too good on this cover of Voe!
Not a PSD. She is just starting to change into a mermaid.
But I want to talk about the airbrushing . . . it's the AGE issue, and they've made the cover girl look like a 12-y-o.
sheesh!
Is it just me or is one of her eyes smaller than the other... her face does not look symmetrical to me...
She became Queen of the Kitchen because she no longer had a sex life after her thighs merged into one.
And yet, I believe that Gwyneth Paltrow comes as a complete, ready assembled human being, not a collection of parts in a box with a diagram and a blue dress. You wouldn't know it from this though.
So that's what Gwyneth Paltrow would look like as a badly drawn caricature brought to life in plasticine and partially melted wax. I always wondered.
Appears to be use of a new (CS5)Photoshop edit option called Puppet Warp. Expect to see a lot more PSDs like this, as more use that option.
She has the correct number of hands. You guys are a tough crowd.
My honourable mention goes to the hand in the bottom right. Let's just crowbar that one onto the page shall we.
Maybe they told her, "OK, Gwyn, pretend you're at your OB check-up an scoot forward another few inches for us. OK, a few more, but don't fall off the bench. OK, one more inch." But that wouldn't explain the weird edge by her left hand ... aw fergedit - PsD.
Im not sure I see the problem with this one. The photo is a little weird, yeah, but Paltrow is soo skinny - she has a very tiny butt.
Can I call mrs. Paltrow butt ugly is is that off limits?
Oh C'MON NOW! It's not a total PS Disaster. The graphic artist responsible just needs a small hand... you know.... to go with Gwyneth's other small hand.
I didn't know Gwyneth was part Fiddler crab!
Twisted leg fusion. Oh God.
thanks for sharing..
Color Experts International
Clippig Path Service Provider
WV lotch = long crotch
I kid you not
This is what happens when you go camping too close to the sun...
I shot a movie with her. Even her face does not look like that!
http://davidikus.blogspot.com/
This wasn't photoshopped; it was Picasso'd!
Come on now...Not even one comment about this just being a wide angle lens issue? You guys are slacking.
I bet if we look at another photo of a different angle of her, we would find a hidden wing.
She's skinny as hell. What butt??? It might be a RL disaster.
VW: wines. YES PLEASE
She's skinny as hell. What butt??? It might be a RL disaster.
VW: wines. YES PLEASE
My friend, who is a girl, has done that.
It puzzles me that they seem to think they will sell more magazines by making the celebrities they put on the cover unrecognizable.
I would love to see a rendition of this image that showed both planes--one for her fused thighs and one for her hips, since they are obviously not on the same plane or even (possibly) in the same universe.
I seriously did not recognize her!
She doesnt look like Paltrow.
Post a Comment