Mad Men: Legless Before Lunchtime

Legless Before Lunchtime PSD
Every so often someone sends me a gem of a PsD with a level of vagueness normally only associated with fortunetellers or income tax forms. So let's hazard a guess and say that this appeared on page 92 of the National Enquirer in 1875.

Thanks to Tobias!
Next Random Photoshop Disaster

36 comments:

waldobaby said...

The prose is pure crap all on its own.

waldobaby said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
andy said...

EXCUSE ME!
Don't you know she is the new swivelling woman. Able to serve her men from all angles thanks to a crafty set of ball bearings inserted in here hips. Put a hose on her head and she also becomes a sprinkler for the garden in summer...

OnlyMi said...

My guess this is the latest GQ where John Hamm just won Man of the Year. And this would explain the line about "for additional credits for men of the year...." Of course that doesn't explain what happened to the rest of her. Perhaps that why she looks a little distressed.

tome said...

That couch has deep pillows.

emily said...

Its an old GQ, like January 2010? Spring at least. Their latest Mad Men cover had Joanie in a god awful dress with airbrushed boobs:/

Fitz said...

AND her hairdo is a few decades too modern. Once again, none of them were at this photoshoot at the same time. Overkill on the genie bottle motif, I might add.

Trucking Tumbleweed said...

Her legs are pushed up in her bra. Obvious!

PoCoLoco said...

Not a PSD.

She's just literally trying to ward-off the unwanted advances of men who like to 'chase skirt'.

Gabriel Dias said...

She's got big boobs. Who cares about legs?
LOL

Jonn Wood said...

Clearly, they were hoping Ms. Hendricks. breasts would distract everyone.

Chris said...

Wow, she really is just a pair of tits.

Angela said...

My god. Poor Christina is slowly being sucked into the bowels of the earth via The Couch Of Evil, and is too drunk to notice. And all of the would-be rescuers are too mesmerized by her bountiful bosom to be helpful.

doka said...

The guy on the right - Is the size of his left arm between his elbow and shoulder perhaps a bit too foreshortened?

(Bet he has to have his suits tailor-made.)

Donna said...

If you get your eyes off the young lady's chest, you will notice that the highlights and shadows throughout the composition are erratic, inconsistent or non-existent.

Also a little depth of field might make the whole thing look more realistic...On second thought, no, it probably wouldn't.

doka said...

The guy in the center -

What's happening inside his jacket?

Is that an unusual shadow?

Or is he wearing an ill-fitted sweater vest (the one that was a present last Christmas from his home-schooled cousin)?

Or maybe the deadline approached too quickly?

Claude said...

Maybe the refractive distortion from the wide angle lens is causing the lower portion of her body to look like a sofa cushion.

I think it is part of the new "chameleon" look that I predict will be sweeping the globe this Fall.

doka said...

Once again, the guy on the right - Was his jacket cloned into an extra long tunic?

(Bet his tailor is blind.)

doka said...

What is supporting (holding up) the ashtray?

doka said...

I love how the interior decorator incorporated three different types of flooring AND three different patterns of carpeting - all in ONE room.

Masterful!!!

Claude said...

WARNING - If you keep looking at the picture, errors start exploding...just like little heart farts.

Without noticing her gumby elbow, I cannot figure out what her neck would look like from a different angle. Can her head realistically sit on her neck like that?

Claude said...

"...MUST STOP LOOKING AT PICTURE...MUST STOP..."

It is not so much the "miniature-esque" furniture that befuddles me, but would you sit on that couch on the far left??? I don't know if the placement of those skinny legs would be able to support any weight. It might have something to do with the "interesting" gravity-defying lamp next to it.

Lets donate some money and get the creator of this masterpiece to take some classes such as: Understanding and Using Perspective Properly (UUPP) and Realistic Composition are Achievable (RCA).

Pirx The Pilot said...

who'd be looking for legs on *this* picture

waldobaby said...

@Donna said "a little depth of field might make the whole thing look more realistic"

That would make the guy on the left seven inches higher. We couldn't have that, now could we...


People are saying this room looks odd. Well, this looks pretty much standard for a fifties upscale suburban house. The lattice wall was very popular if you didn't have kids, pole lamps were at their artistic height, and people put out lots of empty colored bottles. If you couldn't get nicely colored glass, they'd fill them with colored water.

Danish Modern with its short skinny legs and big flat surfaces was something to work for (it wasn't always mired down in the Ikean slums) and that furniture fits, as does the floating stone hearth and the slate floor. The modern art of the period was just as pointless and artless as today's.

The guy on the right with the E J Korvette's suit is obviously a pigeon, er, uh, a client. The "good" suits have vests and are from Robert Hall. They always came with fake snot rags folded into points and stitched to a piece of cardboard, a stupid feature that still refuses to die.

Notice there is no liquor bottle. If you ran out you took the decanter into the kitchen, refilled it from the bottle, and then brought only the decanter back. We can't see the requisite double walled aluminum ice bucket insulated with cork.

What's missing is a box (a huge box) or a bowl of cigarettes and a table top model cigarette lighter. People smoked so much that the things never went stale, and one thing wrong with this picture is that two people are NOT smoking.


WV THROW: somebody write Google and tell them an honest-to-god real word got put in here by mistake (unless they're trying something with infinite monkeys and infinite typewriters).

Jonny Dade said...

- What she said

Josin said...

I fail to notice anything wrong with this boobies.

I'm unsubscribering from your tits because I just can't stand your constant level of knockers.

Steve said...

It's hard to see with the lettering in the way, but isn't she just kneeling on the couch with her legs behind her, obscured from view by her body?

Steve said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Robbie said...

Let's play a game of "how many different pictures has this been stitched together from?" I make it about 7 or 8, but it could easily be more.

Ergo said...

This is clearly a picture from a dream sequence in a futuristic reality where a man has created the perfect scenario, including a woman that only consists of breasts.

"Lets just cut out the unnecessary parts" he said and continued work on his nuclear powered hover boat.

O1192 said...

for just a lousy desk job interview, she really went out on a limb!

BridalWeddingGowns CA said...

WOW, that's great!

orayzio.com said...

@tome, it's not just the couch that has deep pillows.

planktonz said...

who is lady in this pict? she is like madona,

Jessica said...

maybe her legs are tucked under her ginormous breasts! Geeeeezzzzzzzzzzzz

Ravyn Skye said...

OBVIOUSLY Ms. Hendrickson was recently run over by a train and her lower body was severed. To make up for it they extended the area between her neck and breasts as well as giving her two ball joints in her right shoulder.

NOT a disaster and un-subscribering.