OK to disguie the fact we’ve used a legless model lets sit someone reeeeeally close, get her to put her hand on their lap and erase their superfluous upper torso, no-one’ll notice – job’s a good ‘un
http://twitter.com/CreativeTweets Tom Megginson
It hurts just to look at her.
http://twitter.com/Alasska11 Eliza Roche
i might be blind but i dont get this one
Waldobaby
It would be a wee bit difficult to twist this much without the strain of imminent death showing up on one’s face. Just Teas-ing…
Bob
She’s just completed her transformation from snake form and hasn’t solidified her spine yet.
Prikolist
Agreed. Where’s the PSD exactly that all of you are seeing? That’s not a “third leg”, that’s just the calf muscle, pushed toward the side because of the leg below it. Unless she lives in a concentration camp, that’s right where it belongs. Although sitting with legs crossed and leaning to a side like this is not comfy – for me at least – I sat in that pose and looked in the mirror and it looked close enough to the photo in every aspect. Just try it yourself, there is absolutely no PSD relating to her pose here – or anything else that I can spot.
Marci
I think you need a new mirror. Her “under” leg looks like it would come from her right hip (our left). However, her right leg is the top one. In other words, if her right leg is connected to her right hip, then her right hip is directly under her right elbow. And her left hip appears to be directly under the right side of her waist (all “right” and “left” are from her perspective, not from ours).
I suppose it is possible to curve that way if you have a spine that is more flexible than 99.9% of the popluation (including Chinese Acrobats). But the question I would have is – if you have a model that can sit in a way that makes it look like her legs are from a different picture than her torso, why would you have her pose that way? Why make people think you photoshopped badly?
JStass
Don’t forget that if you just look at the other pictures of that model on the site, you can tell that her thighs are not nearly that short. Those knees are far too close to her torso to be anything but from another photo.
Fastskinnydogs
I don’t think the third leg is her calf muscle. That portion of her leg isn’t pressing against anything to push it out that much. And besides, models usually don’t have enough extra anything (muscle, flesh, fat) to push out like that. And it it was her calf muscle, they would have PS’d it out because it’s not attractive. I say it’s her third leg.
Thatguy
Trolls gonna troll.
Nina
@ Prikolist: I will only believe this if you show as a picture of you sitting exactly like this.
Honestly. For once I really thought, that no-one could debate with this monster of a PSD. So, there’s only three options: First: You’re blind and letting your software describe this picture for you. Second, you have a really REALLY bad eye for proportions. Third, you’re a troll.
http://twitter.com/arnoen Arno Enzo
Right… I agree that a lot of the PsDs of late haven’t been too obvious, but yes, you ARE blind as a bat. So is Prikolist.
This is not about the third leg. This is about her legs sitting next to her on the couch.
Waldobaby
Even if the legs are attached to her in a normal way, there is an assumption that whoever vetted this pic had access to PS as a regular thing, so if a shopped pic looks like a disaster, it is, whether parts of her were moved about or not. It’s a PSD in two possible ways but either way it’s a thumb biter.
DogStarMan
She doesn’t have 2 left feet-she has 2 right legs.
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000333840515 David Vonrelem
Her left thigh must have the thickness of a sheet of paper. Look at the line of the couch beneath it.
https://plus.google.com/100003263588328893882/posts Richard Samul
Seriously, just take an actual picture already! Is it really that hard?
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2AI3Y6FHUW6VDSQ6UBY5HPLK7Q Rick J
This one really creeps me out.
http://twitter.com/otowilches otowilches
You should be sued for watermarking a picture that’s not yours.
Whiny_Little_Snot
Raul: Whut?
http://ladyluckbeauty.blogspot.com/ LadyLuck
Gezzus -.-’
Linwenilid
She has three legs. Three. How can anyone miss that??
Hukizyaka
She will have three legs while I do her.
beadman
Now we’re talking!
http://www.facebook.com/smappdooda Bizzaro Galore
My assistants look NOTHING like that!
Frankyboy123
Jim Hjelm or Jim Henson?!
Henke37
We need a category just for disjoint hips.
jeneria
She looks like the prostitute from Beetlejuice who was cut in half and was her torso was sitting next to her legs.
MrRocking
I thought she was a magician’s assistant?
Galileo
I believe there are actually 3 different images composed into one. An empty sofa, a girl standing and a girl sitting.
If the artist then lack knowledge of human proportions, then this would be the outcome.
Thatguy
Aaaand…we’re right back to deleting comments.
guest
The upper half of her torso is shifted away from her pelvis. That’s the joke of the caption. She is posing like that without bending her ribcage, which is impossible. I think the pose is a composite of 2 images, done probably because it looks more “graceful” than realistic.
Location Nyc
You guys are retards. There is nothing wrong with this photo. Study your anatomy.
Rog556
The top leg does seem to ok, with the arm draped to it and such, as her right leg, but I just can’t get the lower leg, and the seemingly third leg to work out at all. Think of this, if the top leg, is her right leg, how could the lower leg, have a knee that far away from the opposite hip?????? Whoa.
VenusFemale
This one got to be the worst photoshop hack job so far!
RoseyGlow
Must be using PhotoShop, Braille edition.
Photoshopeee
Honestly, how does a company look at that cover and say “yep, she’s gorgeous, go to print”?