18 Comments

Victoria’s Secret: With or Without it?

Posted on 18 February by Vernon

We are ready for publishing boss.

We’ve just been featured on Jezebel and the Daily mail Boss!

Just updated the site boss and everything looks great now.

Thanks to hundreds of people who sent this in, we thought it would be better to wait and post the VS reaction.

(8)
(15)
(6)
(4)
Sign up and we'll send you our free online Photoshop Disasters magazine!
  • http://twitter.com/Emily_Mckenzie Emily Mckenzie

    I find it annoying that Daily Mail hasn’t credited this site, which is blatantly where it stole this story from (must be a slow news day at the DM).
    However, considering how many psds we’ve had on this site that came from the DM website, I’m not actually that surprised.

    • yo momma

      Almost any image published by the Daily Fail could feature on PSD just as any article they publish could run as “incomprehensible strings of words in English”.

      After a while finding horrible errors in the Mail is like shooting fish in a barrel–really big fish in a very small barrel.

    • Roo0

      grrr how do i delete comments?

  • Bargonzo

    Whe I saw the first picture, I thought “Oh, right, the usual suspects will argue that her other arm is hidden behind her back…”. Then I saw the second picture… Um, which of course is a totally different take than the first picture, yes, that’s it, a totally different picture, so no PSD again, site going to the dogs, in the last century everything was better, etc.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000333840515 David Vonrelem

    Too much information. Delete the first or the second picture.

  • Circularfile

    This is not a PSD. I think they did an amazing job photoshopping an arm on that one-armed woman. You can’t even tell they photoshopped it in – it looks so natural.

  • http://mondomemento.blogspot.com/ Dee

    whinewhinewhinewhinewhinewhineit’sjustaweirdanglewhinewhinewhinewhinewhine

    • Commie

      +whinewhinewideanglelenswhineIamawomanandIcandothatwhinewhineIwilldrawapaintimagetoshowhowitworkswhinewhine

  • http://www.facebook.com/farlakes Xevious Farlakes

    Very well done, even when you know the model is completely limbless and also her jeans are seamlessly added in the picture. Both attempts ( with one and with two arms ) were very well done. Thanks to science:Powerful prosthetic technology mimics natural hand movements so well amputees can photoshop their pictures again

  • Tyler

    “Thanks to hundreds of people who sent this in, we thought it would be better to wait and post the VS reaction. ”

    Yeah, I’m not buying it. If this was sent in to you lot before the other sites reported it, why would you expect VS to post a reaction. A reaction to what? There’s no shame in saying that you took it from those sites, at least it’s a confirmed PSD for once.

    • Commie

      Congratulations, you found something to whine about.

  • http://www.facebook.com/gabi.garcez Gabriela Garcez

    The existing elbow is weird too.

  • Molly

    Try and imagine her walking like that.

  • Gosun
  • systemofaclown

    I like the idea that VS and other, similar sites have an RSS feed for PsD and watch it obsessively.

  • Jlafuent

    I think her neck looks funny, the tendon attaching to her right collar bone is missing and also the second necklace is not falling according to gravity. Something weird happened there as well.

  • Rfhurley

    I still think it’s cruel to keep calling her “Lefty”…

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RYKQV654UCTVSPZ5DTVQUDHUWU BrianP

    I wouldn’t be surprised if the original was untouched and the new version was created to make it look more natural. I could easily make this pose and hide my arm in just this way, with the front of the sleeve still visible.