In the first image you can play a fun game where you make yourself see that her left leg is the one with the toes pointing away from you, and her right leg is somehow impossibly crossing it and is the other one. In fact that’s how I first saw it, and it took me a few seconds to work out which leg went in which direction. I understand perspective and all that, but I can’t help but feel her right leg is noticeably longer than her left. But it could just be the camera angle.

They have these things at the gym I go to, but they are about eight times the size, so there is no danger of their getting accidentally wedged into any body crevices, as seems to have happened a few times here.

I’m no expert, but I don’t see the advantage of any of the exercises pictured. Whatever they are. Well, maybe the last one.

I wonder where she actually was when her photos were taken. Adding to the general sense of spatial improbability is that the photographs of the model don’t seem to have been taken at the same angle as is implied by the perspective (such as it is) of the background (which I suspect is a PsD all its own.) This is painfully evident in the second-to-last photo. Speaking of which, evidently whatever photo or composite they used as the background doesn’t seem to have had enough wall space on the right to accommodate the model in the main photograph. A commendably understated effort has been made to extend the wall forward, with a tastefully subtle hint of baseboard to the right of the model (her left), but the wall seems to be pure white, not the elegant ivory of the rest of the room. It seems they just gave up faking the wall extension once they had turned the corner above the baseboard – they just did a quick blend to white and called it a day’s work well done.

Handy Tip: The Drop Shadow layer effect in Photoshop is a real time-saver!

I submitted this! Thanks for posting!