Marie Claire Australia: Face Plant

I’ve heard of women pasting on a pretty face, but come on.

Photoshop Disasters

This model seems a bit two-dimensional (literally), and something about how her neck and head fit together seems off. Trust me, I screwed the heads off a lot of action figures growing up.

It was a troubled childhood.

Thanks James for the find.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
  • Skeptic

    I’m having more trouble with her chest area. No nipples? At all? In fact, there is no curvature to the clad area, so it seems that the existing curves have all been airbrushed on or something.

  • http://maitribathbody.com/ Maitri Bath & Body

    Head is about 1/3 too small for the body.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=594989127 Spillage Griffiths

    Aye, look again. Cover her knockers up, and all looks well. It’s her chest that’s been messed with in graphics.

  • hmmrsmith

    and also her breast, it resemble a bit Bruce Lee’s chest

  • Vince

    Upper lips, teeth, nose and eyes seems too much symmetric to me

  • stella

    This looks like the result of one of those youtube videos that show you how to use make-up to make it look like you have six-pack abs – only in this case, they tried to make her look like she had a chest. “First brush on curve with the darkest powder, then blend it to the outside. Now take the lightest color and make a line down the middle. Don’t blend too much. See, we made cleavage where there was none before…blah, blah, blah….” However, her shirt is completely flat.

  • kasmol

    I’m having more trouble with the hips. When you look here http://img256.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=751179194_kerr36_123_35lo.jpg and factor out the hair from the Marie Claire cover, it all seems to work until you get down to the hips. Unless the cover was taken when she was pregnant.

  • Epaminaidos

    The chest ist the real disaster here. I didn’t know that you can pull boobs so far to the outside without screaming in pain.

  • Andulamb

    She’s certainly been modified, but not badly. I don’t see any problems here. But I’m sure you photography and biology experts will disagree.

  • http://twitter.com/bevtastic7 Beverly Jenkins

    Wall-eyed Barbie boobs? Now I’ve seen everything.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=501644963 Janet Cox Tuhey

    There seems to be very little of Miranda Kerr on this cover that hasn’t been manipulated. Those breasts and hips are really bothersome. Her head looks like it was given a mini Jivaroan shrinkage.

    Look what they did to the poor girl in this photo. You could use those arms in a joust. http://www.listal.com/viewimage/658492h

  • Laurenţiu Ghiţă

    What can I say, she is like that, I put another photo of her over and all proportion are the same if you not take in account little difference because of poses.
    P.S. 5 minute PS Disaster from me.

  • http://twitter.com/iRictor Shaun☆翔☆Leitmeyer

    only problem I see is too much glow making her cleavage look very undefined.
    The girl has a small head, it isn’t Photoshop.